BIO IP News Weekly for June 26, 2009

This week’s BIO IP News Weekly includes an analysis of Professor John Duffy in Business Week, an essay on technology transfer and university-industry collaboration in the Scientist Magazine, updates on USPTO funding and follow-on biologics, a blogger’s look at a U.S. Senator’s struggles to defend intellectual property rights, as well as a link to the recently published 2009 OECD Biotechnology Statistics report summary.

Also, note that Managing IP is having a free webinar on green tech innovation and intellectual property next Tuesday, June 30, 2009.

Federal Trade Commission holds “Evolving IP Marketplace” hearing on Friday, April 17, 2009

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is hosting another meeting in a series entitled “The Evolving IP Marketplace.”  The series of hearings (says the FTC website) will “explore changes in intellectual property law, patent-related business models, and new learning regarding the operation of the IP marketplace since the FTC issued its October 2003 report, To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy A Report by the Federal Trade Commission.”

Two panels will discuss “Markets for Intellectual Property” this Friday, April 17. Click here for the April 17 meeting agenda.

The final hearing in Berkeley, CA (May 4 -5 , 2009) will “explore how markets for patents and technology operate in different industries, whether those markets operate efficiently, and how patent policy might be adjusted to respond to problems in those markets in order to better promote innovation and competition.”

Visit http://www.ftc.gov/bc/workshops/ipmarketplace/ to view information and presentations from the entire series.

Is the FTC well-suited to take on IP/Patent policy?

On December 5, 2008 the Federal Trade Commission held the first in a series of hearings entitled: The Evolving IP Marketplace. According to the FTC, the hearings are intended to examine changes in intellectual property law and patent-related business models since the FTC issued its October 2003 report, entitled To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy A Report by the Federal Trade Commission.

December 5th’s hearing featured CAFC Chief Judge Paul Michel and speakers such as Q. Todd Dickinson, Executive Director of AIPLA, Rod McKelvie, Covington and Burling and Jay Thomas, Georgetown University law professor among others. The panelists explored the emergence of new business models involving the buying, selling and licensing of patents; recent and proposed changes in remedies law, their impact on innovation and consumers, and the use of economic analysis in determining remedies; and changes in legal doctrines that affect the value and licensing of patents brought about by recent Supreme Court cases on obviousness, declaratory judgment and exhaustion.

FTC Chairman William Kovacic said that “coming up with good solutions to IP policy requires a genuinely multidisciplinary” approach, and that the FTC is well-suited to the task because of its ability to educate, convene and take appropriate enforcement actions.

But Chief Judge Michel said that neither Congress nor the executive branch should be actively involved in overhauling intellectual property but that “We will probably make more progress in the courts through case law” than by asking the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or Congress to wade deep into intellectual property conflicts.

While the 2003 process included the cooperation of the USPTO its unclear whether the Agency has been involved in the current process. The FTC is accepting comments in response to its Federal Register Notice by Feb 5, 2009.